Skip to main content

How a Scale-Up Achieved 99% Uptime: Migrating AI Workflows from On-Prem to Temporal Cloud Without Downtime

Executive Summary

A fast-growing scale-up built sophisticated on-premises Temporal deployment to power AI workflows and business process orchestration for executive leadership and third-party integrations.

The self-hosted infrastructure quickly became a bottleneck, as chronic reliability issues, availability gaps, and mounting engineering overhead consumed resources that should have been building products.

Xgrid executed a zero-downtime migration to Temporal Cloud using feature flags and dual-run strategies, eliminating infrastructure management overhead while guaranteeing 99.99% availability.

The result: AI agent workflows that complete reliably, engineering teams focused on innovation instead of cluster babysitting, and operational costs that actually make sense.

The Real Cost of “It Works on My Machine”

The platform ran self-hosted Temporal to orchestrate AI workflows—multi-step LLM processes, data transformations, external API integrations. These workflows powered executive decision-making and third-party systems where failures meant lost state, wasted compute costs, and broken integrations.

Self-hosted Temporal provided critical value: reliable orchestration for sequences that couldn’t afford mid-execution failure. But the self-hosted deployment revealed problems as usage scaled.

  • Availability gaps impacted users directly. No robust high availability configuration meant infrastructure issues translated to workflow interruptions. Executive users noticed. Partners complained.
  • Scaling required manual intervention. Each growth phase needed capacity planning, infrastructure provisioning, careful rebalancing. Business velocity consistently outpaced infrastructure velocity.
  • No real disaster recovery. Backup procedures existed on paper but weren’t battle-tested. Any serious failure scenario would require manual recovery with unclear data loss boundaries.

The Infrastructure Trap: Why Moving to Cloud Wasn’t Enough

The team migrated infrastructure to Oracle Cloud, expecting cloud-native benefits to fix availability and scaling issues.

Some hardware management burden disappeared. The operational problems didn’t.

  • Infrastructure costs stayed high and unpredictable. Running self-hosted Temporal on cloud infrastructure meant database instances, compute capacity, load balancers, storage. Overprovisioning for peak load and high availability drove costs higher than expected.
  • Engineers still owned the entire operational stack. Monitoring cluster health, applying version upgrades, executing database migrations, troubleshooting performance degradation—all required specialized knowledge and constant attention.
  • Disaster recovery remained manual. Cloud provider redundancy helped, but the team still needed to design, implement, and maintain failover logic and backup strategies. Any failure scenario required intervention and carried data loss risk.

The infrastructure moved. The problems followed.

The Solution: Zero-Downtime Migration to Temporal Cloud

Xgrid designed a migration strategy prioritizing two non-negotiable requirements: absolute zero disruption to running workflows and complete confidence in new infrastructure before cutting over. The approach leveraged feature flags at the API layer to enable controlled, gradual migration without touching workflow code.

1. Feature Flag Architecture for Dual-Run Strategy

Implemented feature flag system at the API layer controlling which Temporal cluster (self-hosted or cloud) would handle new workflow executions. This allowed routing different workflows to different backends without code changes, enabling gradual validation and rollback capability.

The architectural decision was deliberate: controlling routing at the API layer rather than within workflow code meant the migration became a configuration change instead of a code deployment. Instant rollback if issues emerged. Zero risk of introducing bugs into battle-tested workflow logic.

2. Parallel Infrastructure Validation

Set up Temporal Cloud alongside existing self-hosted deployment, configuring namespaces, workflows, and activities to mirror the production environment. Validated connectivity, authentication, monitoring, and observability tooling before routing any production traffic.

This parallel run phase answered critical questions: Does authentication work correctly? Are monitoring integrations capturing the right metrics? Do workflows execute with comparable performance? Can we debug issues as easily as on self-hosted?

Only after affirmative answers to all questions did any production workflow touch cloud infrastructure.

3. Graceful Workflow Draining Process

Stopped routing new workflows to self-hosted cluster while monitoring existing workflows to completion. Implemented real-time tracking to ensure zero workflows remained in-flight on old infrastructure before decommissioning, preventing state loss or incomplete executions.

For AI workflows where mid-execution failure meant wasted LLM API costs and corrupted state, careful draining was non-negotiable. Each in-flight workflow was tracked: when it started, current execution state, projected completion time. Decommissioning happened only after the last workflow completed successfully.

4. Staged Cutover with Rollback Safety

Gradually shifted workflow types to Temporal Cloud in controlled batches, starting with lower-risk workflows and monitoring for issues. Maintained ability to instantly route traffic back to self-hosted infrastructure if any problems appeared, ensuring complete safety throughout migration.

The rollout sequence was risk-based: background jobs and internal tools migrated first, customer-facing workflows next, mission-critical executive dashboards last. Each cohort ran on cloud infrastructure for a validation period before the next cohort migrated. Feature flags allowed instant reversion at any stage.

5. Infrastructure Cleanup and Cost Optimization

Once all workflows successfully completed on self-hosted cluster and Temporal Cloud proved stable under full production load, removed self-hosted cluster support from API codebase and decommissioned Oracle infrastructure, immediately reducing operational costs and engineering maintenance burden.

The cleanup was methodical: verify zero in-flight workflows on old infrastructure, remove feature flag routing logic from codebase, decommission Oracle database instances, terminate compute resources, validate cost reduction in next billing cycle. Only then was the migration considered complete.

Implementation at a Glance

Phase Key Deliverables
Assessment & Planning Migration strategy, risk analysis, feature flag architecture design
Cloud Environment Setup Temporal Cloud namespace configuration, workflow deployment, monitoring integration
Feature Flag Implementation API-layer routing logic, dual-cluster client configuration, rollback mechanisms
Parallel Validation Test workflow execution on Cloud, performance benchmarking, observability validation
Staged Migration Gradual workflow routing to Cloud, real-time monitoring, completion tracking on self-hosted
Infrastructure Cleanup Self-hosted cluster decommission, Oracle infrastructure teardown, cost validation

Results: From Infrastructure Burden to Engineering Leverage

The operational shift happened immediately. Workflows that previously required constant infrastructure attention now run reliably on Temporal Cloud without intervention.

Operational Reliability →  Zero Incidents, Zero Firefighting

  • Zero workflow disruptions during migration: Complete cutover executed without a single workflow failure, timeout, or state loss across all AI agent workflows and third-party integrations.
  • 99.99% availability SLA eliminated reliability gaps:Temporal Cloud’s managed infrastructure provides automatic failover with no maintenance windows impacting users.
  • Built-in disaster recovery: Automatic backups, point-in-time recovery, and multi-region redundancy handled entirely by Temporal Cloud without engineering effort.

Process Efficiency → Engineering Time Freed to Ship Features

  • Infrastructure management eliminated: Engineering team no longer spends time managing Temporal clusters, applying upgrades, troubleshooting database issues, or handling operational incidents.
  • Automatic scaling without intervention: AI workflow volume grows without capacity planning or manual infrastructure changes. Temporal Cloud automatically handles load increases.
  • Faster time to market: New AI workflows and integrations deploy without concerns about cluster capacity or operational readiness.

Technical Performance → Reliable Execution Even at Peak Load

  • Consistent workflow execution: AI agent workflows with multiple LLM calls and external integrations complete reliably without timeout issues that occurred on self-hosted infrastructure.
  • Improved observability: Temporal Cloud’s built-in monitoring and metrics provide better visibility into workflow execution, making debugging and optimization significantly easier.
  • Seamless third-party integration: External agents calling workflow endpoints experience consistent performance without availability gaps that previously caused integration failures.

Cost Impact → Predictable Costs, No Hidden Engineering Tax

  • Lower total cost of ownership: Eliminating infrastructure costs and engineering overhead resulted in significant savings compared to self-hosted deployment, especially when factoring in hidden costs of operational time and incident response.
  • Predictable pricing: Usage-based Temporal Cloud pricing replaced unpredictable infrastructure costs and the need to overprovision for peak capacity.

What We Learned (And What Your Architecture Should Too)

These are six strategic decisions that separate successful migrations from disaster stories:

  • 1. Feature flags aren’t optional for critical migrations.
    They enable gradual rollout, instant rollback capability, and confidence to migrate without risking production stability. Big-bang cutover is gambling with production.

  • 2. Workflow draining requires patience.
    Waiting for all in-flight workflows to complete on old infrastructure prevents state loss and ensures clean cutover. Rushing to decommission guarantees problems.

  • 3. Self-hosted operational costs hide in engineering time.
    Infrastructure bills are visible. Engineering hours spent on maintenance, upgrades, incident response, and capacity planning are invisible until you calculate opportunity cost.

  • 4. AI workflows demand reliable orchestration.
    Multi-step LLM processes cost money and carry state. Losing execution progress halfway through means wasted API spend and inconsistent results. Reliability is non-negotiable.

  • 5. Proactive migration beats reactive firefighting.
    Moving infrastructure while systems are stable is orders of magnitude easier than migrating during a production crisis.

  • 6. Observability enables confidence.
    You can’t validate new infrastructure without baseline metrics from old infrastructure. Measurement turns migration from gut-feel to engineering discipline.

Advanced Patterns

The platform now builds on stable infrastructure:

  • Expanded AI workflow coverage without infrastructure concerns limiting feature development.
  • Multi-region deployment leveraging Temporal Cloud’s global infrastructure to reduce latency for distributed users.
  • Advanced workflow patterns like sagas, compensation logic, and human-in-the-loop approvals implemented without operational overhead.
  • Enhanced monitoring and analytics building on Temporal Cloud’s observability to track workflow performance and usage trends.
  • Scaled third-party ecosystem with confidence that workflow infrastructure handles increased volume automatically.

Conclusion: Infrastructure Is a Cost Center—Treat It Like One

Your engineers joined to build AI products. They’re running database migrations instead.

Workflow timeouts increasing with usage. Scaling strategy is “add infrastructure and hope.” Disaster recovery plan untested. Senior engineers firefighting infrastructure instead of shipping features.

The math doesn’t work: Each dollar on self-hosted infrastructure costs three more in engineering time. Each workflow failure costs customer trust. Each scaling incident delays launches.

Here’s what most teams miss: production-grade Temporal isn’t about technical capability—it’s knowing which problems are worth solving yourself. 

Get infrastructure right (managed services, feature flags, observability), and migrations execute smoothly. Skip it, and you’re explaining to executives why workflows are down.

You’re either 90 days away from this crisis or you’re already in it.

If you’re building AI agents and workflows are creeping into reliability issues: you need a production-ready orchestration blueprint that gets you to stable infrastructure fast, without wasting six months learning lessons the hard way.

If you’re already in production with self-hosted Temporal: you need to understand your actual risk profile. What’s costing engineering time? What’s one incident away from breaking? What’s the cost of staying versus the cost of migrating?

The question isn’t whether you can afford to move. It’s whether you can afford to stay.

Ready to eliminate infrastructure overhead? Work with our Temporal experts.

Related Articles

Related Articles